|
|
|
|
|
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
Name: | Jane Doe | Dates of Examination: | ******** |
Gender: | Female | Date of Birth: | ******** |
Chronological Age: | 44-years, 6-months | Education: | BA/Humanities |
Referral: | Self | Examiner: | Sherri Sharp |
The patient is a 44-year-old, left-handed, white female who was referred
for neuropsychological consultation with chief complaints of memory loss
and confusion. The patient was seen on November 7, 2001 and administered
a clinical interview and mental status exam. On December 7, 2001, a neuropsychological
evaluation was conducted, consisting of the following: Dean-Woodcock
Sensory and Motor Assessment Battery, Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive
Ability and Achievement, and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
- 2 (MMPI-2).
EMOTIONAL STATUS
The patient was alert and oriented times three. Her mood was generally controlled and remained stable. She denied depression, suicidal ideation, manic episodes, dysphoria, and homicidal ideation. The patient admitted panic attacks, anxiety, racing thoughts, and free-floating anxiety. She also reported memory loss and confusion. The patient is presently taking Pamelor and Sythroid.
The MMPI-2 was completed by the patient. The results were not
available at the time of this report.
INTELLECTUAL FUNCTIONING
General intellectual functioning is a measure of broad cognitive ability.
The results indicated the patient’s general cognitive ability to be in
the high average range (IQ =105).
FLUID REASONING
Fluid reasoning involves the ability to reason, form concepts, and solve problems using unfamiliar information or procedures. The patient’s ability to learn and apply new concepts when given feedback was within normal limits.
On a measure of analysis-synthesis, which involves analyzing components
of an incomplete logic puzzle and providing the missing components, the
patient’s performance was within normal limits. The ability to visually
match and combine shapes necessary in solving abstract visual-spatial problems
was within normal limits.
MEMORY/LEARNING
Short term, or immediate, memory (<30 seconds) was within normal limits for unrelated words and within normal limits for simple words, phrases, and sentences presented auditorily. Non-verbal, short-term (<30 seconds) recognition memory was within normal limits.
Long term, or intermediate memory (>30 seconds) involving the recall
of visual stimuli which have been associated with unfamiliar auditory stimuli
was within normal limits. When new visual symbols (rebuses) were associated
with orally presented familiar words, the patient’s recall of visual symbols
was within normal limits.
PROCESSING SPEED
Processing speed requires the patient to maintain focused attention
on rather automatic cognitive tasks when under pressure. The patient’s
ability to scan and compare unfamiliar drawings was within normal limits.
When required to scan and locate identical numbers in a row, the patient
was within normal limits.
QUANTITATIVE ABILITY
This function involves the ability to manipulate numeric symbols and
to reason procedurally with quantitative information and relationships.
The patient’s skill in performing mathematical calculation was within normal
limits for an individual of similar age and educational background. Further,
the patient’s skill in analyzing and solving practical mathematical problems
was within normal limits.
MOTOR FUNCTIONS
The patient’s gait and Station were within normal limits. Romberg testing was negative.
Assessment indicated a preferred mixed preference pattern for motor
activities. Finger-to-nose assessment showed fine motor coordination to
be within normal limits. The hand-thigh test showed coordination with alternation
motion to be within normal limits for both hands. Simple manual dexterity,
as measured by finger tapping, was within normal limits for both hands.
Strength of grip was within normal limits for her left hand and mildly
impaired for her right hand. No construction dyspraxia was noted. Performance
of simple movement tasks upon command was within normal limits for both
hands. Measures of ideomotor movement, with tests of mime movements, indicated
no ideomotor dyspraxia.
ACQUIRED LANGUAGE
Verbal expression was characterized by no dysarthria. Oral vocabulary, as measured by the knowledge of word meanings presented orally, was within normal limits. No dysnomia was noted. More complex vocabulary, when presented with pictured objects, was within normal limits.
The patient’s performance in identifying isolated letters and words
was within normal limits. When required to read short passages and demonstrate
comprehension, performance was within normal limits. On a test of spelling
and punctuation the patient was within normal limits.
SENSORY FUNCTIONS
Visual acuity using a near point estimate indicated 20/20 for the left eye and 20/30 for the right. The Visual Confrontation test showed no errors for either visual field. A clinical exam indicated simple auditory sensory perception to be moderately impaired for both ears. Assessment of tactile perception showed no errors for either hand. The simultaneous examination showed no suppressions on either the left or right. No evidence of finger agnosia was noted for either hand.
Tactile Information Processing
Tactile perception of simple and complex stimuli, when presented on the palm of the hands, was within normal limits for both hands. The patient’s ability to recognize simple objects using only tactile and kinesthetic cues was within normal limits for both hands.
Auditory Information Processing
Auditory closure of incomplete words missing one or more phonemes was within normal limits. The patient’s ability to integrate, or blend, sounds into words was within normal limits.
Visual Information Processing
Visual discrimination or visual closure, requiring the ability to name
pictures of simple objects after they had been altered in one of several
ways, was within normal limits.
SUMMARY AND IMPRESSIONS
1) The patient is an 44-year-old, left-handed, white female of high average cognitive ability. Academically, she appears to be performing at a level commensurate with her overall cognitive ability, thus no evidence of a learning disability was noted.
2) In general, neuropsychological functions were within normal limits. However, she did exhibit moderate impairment in both ears for auditory sensory perception. Strength of grip was mildly impaired for her right hand.
3) Emotionally, the patient presents with memory loss and confusion. She admitted experiencing panic attacks, anxiety, racing thoughts, and free-floating anxiety. The results of the MMPI-2 were not available at the time of this report.
4) In summary, the patient’s examination is consistent with an
adult of high average intellectual ability. Her achievement performance
was commensurate with her cognitive ability. Although the patient's
chief complaint was related to memory difficulties, none were exhibited
during the evaluation.
_____________________________
______________
Sherri A. Sharp, M.S.
Date
Examiner